SEA|WALL

In the context of future proofing the vulnerable coastlines of Japan, the conundrum of controlled risk puts before us a choice:

A choice to control risk by constructing a seemingly reliable type of infrastructure such as a high enough wall which might serve a purpose of redirecting potentially deadly swells of ocean. Main questions that arise and are probably unanswerable: how high for any type of protection and where to is the water redirected?

New York Times of March 13th 2011: Seawalls Offered Little Protection Against Tsunami’s Crushing Waves

Considering the risk of failure in concrete terms I looked at what happened in Fukushima on the day of the Tsunami. What I pieced together through a few articles showed that the design of the plant’s emergency back up power generator actually caused the crucial cooling system to fail in reactors 1-4. Reactors 5 and 6 were designed at a later stage and there the back up generators were inside the reinforced reactor building.

Print

Even though the events in Fukushima are not complex at all, they are clearly caused by a lack of integration of risk, it becomes evident that control might be a dangerous illusion.

Source: http://www.spektrum.de/news/fukushima-auch-in-deutschland/1117166